Change in taste sensation after orthognathic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of orthognathic surgery on taste sensation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients scheduled to undergo Le Fort I osteotomy (LFIO), sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO), and bimaxillary surgery (BMS) were evaluated by administering localized and whole-mouth taste tests preoperatively and postoperatively at months 1, 3, and 6. The patients were asked to identify the quality of four basic tastes applied to six locations on the palate and tongue and to rate the taste intensities they perceived. Taste recognition thresholds and taste intesity scores were evaluted according to operation groups and follow-ups. RESULTS: There were significant decreases in the quinine HCl recognition thresholds at the postoperative follow-ups compared to the preoperative in LFIO patients (p = 0.043). There were significant decreases in sucrose taste intensity scores in the right posterolateral part of the tongue at months 3 and 6 compared to preoperative in SSRO patients (p = 0.046), and significant increases in quinine HCL taste intensity scores in the right and left anterior parts of the tongue at month 6 compared to preoperative in LFIO patients (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Taste perception is affected due to potential damage to the chemosensory nerves during orthognathic surgical procedures. Generally, non-significant alterations have been observed in taste perception after orthognathic surgery, except for significant alterations in bitter and sweet taste perceptions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Maxillofacial surgeons should be aware of taste perception change after orthognathic surgery procedures and patients should be informed accordingly. THE TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER (TRN): NCT06103422/Date of registration: 10.17.2023 (retrospectively registered).

Factors associated with quality of life before and after orthognathic surgery.

PURPOSE: Evaluate which factors compromise patients' quality of life who have undergone orthognathic surgery in the pre and postoperative period of 2 years. STUDY DESIGN: In this longitudinal prospective study, 46 adult patients undergoing orthognathic surgery were evaluated. The primary outcome variable was quality of life, assessed using the overall score of the orthognathic quality of life questionnaire (OQLQ) in the pre and 2-year postoperative periods. The predictor variables were axis I (temporomandibular dysfunction) and axis II (psychosocial) RDC/TMD diagnoses, assessed preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively; profile, asymmetry, and open bite preoperatively; and orthodontic treatment active 2 years postoperatively. The covariables were age and sex. The OQLQ score was compared preoperatively and postoperatively using the Wilcoxon test and with the other variables using the Mann-Whitney and Kruskall-Wallis tests. RESULTS: Preoperatively, higher OQLQ scores were associated with myofascial pain (P = .012) and severe depression (P = .030). Two years after surgery, there was an improvement in overall OQLQ (P < .001), myofascial pain (P = .012) and chronic pain (P = .001). However, higher OQLQ scores were associated with individuals who had myofascial pain (P = .012), active orthodontic treatment (P = .007), and other nonspecific physical symptoms including pain (NSPSIP) (P = .049). CONCLUSION: Quality of life was affected preoperatively by myofascial pain and depression, and although it improved significantly 2 years after surgery, it continued to be affected by myofascial pain, NSPSIP, and active orthodontic treatment.

Validation of a fully automatic three-dimensional assessment of orthognathic surgery.

The aim of the present study was to propose and validate FAST3D: a fully automatic three-dimensional (3D) assessment of the surgical accuracy and the long-term skeletal stability of orthognathic surgery. To validate FAST3D, the agreement between FAST3D and a validated state-of-the-art semi-automatic method was calculated by intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) at a 95 % confidence interval. A one-sided hypothesis test was performed to evaluate whether the absolute discrepancy between the measurements produced by the two methods was statistically significantly below a clinically relevant error margin of 0.5 mm. Ten subjects (six male, four female; mean age 24.4 years), class II and III, who underwent a combined three-piece Le Fort I osteotomy, bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and genioplasty, were included in the validation study. The agreement between the two methods was excellent for all measurements, ICC range (0.85-1.00), and fair for the rotational stability of the chin, ICC = 0.54. The absolute discrepancy for all measurements was statistically significantly lower than the clinical relevant error margin (p < 0.008). Within the limitations of the present validation study, FAST3D demonstrated to be reliable and may be adopted whenever appropriate in order to reduce the work load of the medical staff.

Three-dimensional facial soft-tissue changes after surgical orthodontics in different vertical facial types of skeletal Class III malocclusion: A retrospective study.

The study compared the soft-tissue response to hard-tissue movement among different Class III vertical facial types after orthognathic surgery (OGS). The study included 90 consecutive adult patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion who underwent two-jaw OGS. Patients were divided into three groups (high, medium, and low angle) based on the presurgical Frankfort-mandibular plane angle. Cone-beam computerized tomographs were taken before surgery and after debonding. Soft- and hard-tissue linear and angular measurements were performed using three-dimensional reconstruction images. One-way analysis of variance was used for intergroup comparisons. Soft tissue tended to respond more to hard-tissue movement in the lower lip area in patients with low angle (mean = 0.089, SD = 0.047, p = 0.023), whereas no significant difference was observed for other sites. Consistently, L1/Li thickness increased most significantly in the high-angle group (mean = 1.98, SD = 2.14, p = 0.0001), and B/Si thickness decreased most significantly after surgery (mean = 2.16, SD = 2.68, p = 0.016). The findings suggest that the high-angle group had a higher chance of undergoing genioplasty to enhance chin contour. Different OGS plans should be considered for different Class III vertical facial types.

Influencing factors for the development of obstructive sleep apnea after orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III patients: A systematic review.

This systematic review aimed to investigate the factors that may contribute to the development of OSA after orthognathic surgery in patients with skeletal class III. Electronic searches of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were conducted up to December 10, 2022. In total, 277 studies were retrieved and screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and 14 were finally selected. All studies were of medium quality (moderate risk of bias). The occurrence of OSA after orthognathic surgery in patients with class III skeletal relationships depends on surgical factors and patient self-factors. Surgical factors include surgery type, amount of maxillary and mandibular movement, and the patient's postoperative swelling. Patient self-factors include weight, age, gender, and hypertrophy of the soft palate, tonsils, and tongue. According to information in the 14 selected articles, the incidences of OSA after Le Fort I impaction and BSSO setback, BSSO setback, and Le Fort I advancement and BSSO setback were 19.2%, 8.57%, and 0.7%, respectively, mostly accompanied with greater amounts of mandibular recession. However, no clear evidence exists to confirm that orthognathic surgery is a causative factor for postoperative sleep breathing disorders in patients with mandibular prognathism. The wider upper airway in patients with class III skeletal might be the reason for the rare occurrence of OSA after surgery. In addition, obesity and advanced age may lead to sleep apnea after orthognathic surgery. Obese patients should be advised to lose weight preoperatively.

OrthoCalc: The six degrees of freedom measurement workflow of rotational and displacement changes for maxilla positioning evaluation.

BACKGROUND: This study is undertaken to establish the accuracy and reliability of OrthoCalc, a 3D application designed for the evaluation of maxillary positioning. METHODS: We registered target virtual planned models, maxillary models from pre-operative and post-operative CT scans, and post-operative intra-oral scans to a common reference system, allowing for digital evaluation. To assess rotational changes, we introduced a novel measurement method based on virtual cuboid models. Displacement errors were calculated based on proposed registration matrices. We also compared OrthoCalc to established commercial medical software as a benchmark. RESULTS: Statistical significance calculated showed no significant differences between OrthoCalc and commercial software. the biggest error of 0.04 degree in rotation change was found in the yaw. A maximum displacement change of 0.75 mm was found in the X direction. CONCLUSIONS: Our study validates OrthoCalc as a precise and reliable tool for assessing maxillary position changes with six degrees of freedom in orthognathic surgery, endorsing its clinical utility.

Machine learning-based decision support system for orthognathic diagnosis and treatment planning.

BACKGROUND: Dento-maxillofacial deformities are common problems. Orthodontic-orthognathic surgery is the primary treatment but accurate diagnosis and careful surgical planning are essential for optimum outcomes. This study aimed to establish and verify a machine learning-based decision support system for treatment of dento-maxillofacial malformations. METHODS: Patients (n = 574) with dento-maxillofacial deformities undergoing spiral CT during January 2015 to August 2020 were enrolled to train diagnostic models based on five different machine learning algorithms; the diagnostic performances were compared with expert diagnoses. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. The adaptive artificial bee colony algorithm was employed to formulate the orthognathic surgical plan, and subsequently evaluated by maxillofacial surgeons in a cohort of 50 patients. The objective evaluation included the difference in bone position between the artificial intelligence (AI) generated and actual surgical plans for the patient, along with discrepancies in postoperative cephalometric analysis outcomes. RESULTS: The binary relevance extreme gradient boosting model performed best, with diagnostic success rates > 90% for six different kinds of dento-maxillofacial deformities; the exception was maxillary overdevelopment (89.27%). AUC was > 0.88 for all diagnostic types. Median score for the surgical plans was 9, and was improved after human-computer interaction. There was no statistically significant difference between the actual and AI- groups. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning algorithms are effective for diagnosis and surgical planning of dento-maxillofacial deformities and help improve diagnostic efficiency, especially in lower medical centers.

Social, intellectual, psychological, and attractiveness judgements of lay people about patients before and after combined orthodontic-orthognathic surgical treatment.

BACKGROUND: Facial appearance plays a significant role in the success of social interactions. There is a limited amount of evidence investigating the influence of combined orthodontic-orthognathic surgical treatment on the social judgments of lay people. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether changes in facial appearance following orthognathic surgery alter the social judgements made by lay people. ETHICAL APPROVAL: Ethical approval was granted from the University of Sheffield School of Clinical Dentistry Research Ethics Committee on 17th August 2020 (Reference: 033775). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional, web-based survey involved clinical photographs of six Caucasian female patients pre- and post-combined orthodontic-orthognathic treatment. Three patients had a pre-treatment class 2 skeletal pattern, and three patients had a pre-treatment class 3 skeletal pattern. Staff and students at the University of Sheffield, UK were invited to evaluate five personality traits: (i) friendliness, (ii) intelligence, (iii) attractiveness, (iv) self-confidence, and (5) trustworthiness using a 5-point Likert scale. The trait scores were summed to obtain a total social judgement score, and a paired t-test was used to compare the total scores from pre- and post-treatment images. RESULTS: There were 261 responses to the survey of which 181 (75%) were completed fully. The total social judgement scores from after treatment images were higher compared with the pre-treatment images (mean diff 1.6; P < .001) indicating more positive social judgements. The improvements in perceived social judgments were more notable for class 3 patients (mean diff 2.7) compared to class 2 patients (mean diff 0.7). CONCLUSION: Social judgement scores were higher (more positive) from post-treatment images of patient faces than their pre-treatment images. The findings highlight the possible indirect benefits combined orthodontic-orthognathic surgical treatment may have on an individual in a social setting.

[Mandibular condyle localization in orthognathic surgery based on mandibular movement trajectory and its preliminary accuracy verification].

OBJECTIVE: To establish and assess the precision of pre-surgical condyle position planning using mandibular movement trajectory data for orthognathic surgery. METHODS: Skull data from large-field cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and dental oral scan data were imported into IVSPlan 1.0.25 software for 3D reconstruction and fusion, creating 3D models of the maxilla and mandible. Trajectory data of mandibular movement were collected using a mandibular motion recorder, and the data were integrated with the jaw models within the software. Subsequently, three-dimensional trajectories of the condyle were obtained through matrix transformations, rendering them visually accessible. A senior oral and maxillofacial surgeon with experience in both diagnosis and treatment of temporomandibular joint disease and orthognathic surgery selected the appropriate condyle position using the condyle movement trajectory interface. During surgical design, the mobile mandibular proximal segment was positioned accordingly. Routine orthognathic surgical planning was completed by determining the location of the mandibular distal segment, which was based on occlusal relationships with maxilla and facial aesthetics. A virtual mandible model was created by integrating data from the proximal and distal segment bone. Subsequently, a solid model was generated through rapid prototyping. The titanium plate was pre-shaped on the mandibular model, and the screw hole positions were determined to design a condylar positioning guide device. In accordance with the surgical plan, orthognathic surgery was performed, involving mandibular bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO). The distal segment of the mandible was correctly aligned intermaxillary, while the proximal bone segment was positioned using the condylar positioning guide device and the pre-shaped titanium plate. The accuracy of this procedure was assessed in a study involving 10 patients with skeletal class Ⅱ malocclusion. Preoperative condyle location planning and intraoperative positioning were executed using the aforementioned techniques. CBCT data were collected both before the surgery and 2 weeks after the procedure, and the root mean square (RMS) distance between the preope-rative design position and the actual postoperative condyle position was analyzed. RESULTS: The RMS of the condyle surface distance measured was (1.59±0.36) mm (95%CI: 1.35-1.70 mm). This value was found to be significantly less than 2 mm threshold recommended by the expert consensus (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The mandibular trajectory may play a guiding role in determining the position of the mandibular proximal segment including the condyle in the orthognathic surgery. Through the use of a condylar positioning guide device and pre-shaped titanium plates, the condyle positioning can be personalized and customized with clinically acceptable accuracy.

[Comparison of the virtual surgical planning position of maxilla and condyle with the postoperative real position in patients with mandibular protrusion].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the difference between virtual surgical planning (VSP) position and postoperative real position of maxilla and condyle, and to explore the degree of intraoperative realization of VSP after orthognathic surgery. METHODS: In this study, 36 patients with mandibular protrusion deformity from January 2022 to December 2022 were included. All the patients had been done bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) combined with Le Fort Ⅰ osteotomy under guidance of VSP. The VSP data (T0) and 1-week postoperative CT (T1) were collected, the 3D model of postoperative CT was established and segmented into upper and lower jaws in CCMF Plan software. At the same time, accor-ding to the morphology of palatal folds, the virtual design was registered with the postoperative model, and the unclear maxillary dentition in the postoperative model was replaced. Then the postoperative model was matched with VSP model by registration of upper skull anatomy that was not affected by the operation. The three-dimensional reference plane and coordinate system were established. Selecting anatomical landmarks and their connections of condyle and maxilla for the measurement, we compared the coordinate changes of marker points in three directions, and the angle changes between the line connecting the marker points and the reference plane to analyze the positional deviation and the angle deviation of the postoperative condyle and maxilla compared to VSP. RESULTS: The postoperative real position of the maxilla deviates from the VSP by nearly 1 mm in the horizontal and vertical directions, and the anteroposterior deviation was about 1.5 mm. In addition, most patients had a certain degree of counterclockwise rotation of the maxilla after surgery. Most of the bilateral condyle moved forward, outward and downward (the average distance deviation was 0.15 mm, 1.54 mm, 2.19 mm, respectively), and rotated forward, outward and upward (the average degree deviation was 4.32°, 1.02°, 0.86°, respectively) compared with the VSP. CONCLUSION: VSP can be mostly achieved by assistance of 3D printed occlusal plates, but there are certain deviations in the postoperative real position of maxilla and condyle compared with VSP, which may be related to the rotation axis of the mandible in the VSP. It is necessary to use patient personalized condylar rotation axis for VSP, and apply condylar positioning device to further improve surgical accuracy.

Three-dimensional positioning of the maxilla using novel intermediate splints in maxilla-first orthognathic surgery for correction of skeletal class III deformity.

OBJECTIVES: Successful orthognathic surgery requires accurate transfer of the intraoperative surgical plan. This study aimed to (1) evaluate the surgical error of a novel intermediate splint in positioning the maxilla during maxilla-first orthognathic surgery and (2) determine factors influencing surgical error. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study examined 83 patients who consecutively underwent Le Fort I osteotomy for correction of skeletal class III deformity using a novel intermediate splint and a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy. Surgical error was the outcome variable, measured as the difference in postoperative translational and rotational maxillary position from the virtual plan. Measures included asymmetry, need and amount for mandibular opening during fabrication of intermediate splints, and planned and achieved skeletal movement. RESULTS: Mean errors in translation for vertical, sagittal, and transversal dimensions were 1.0 ± 0.7 mm, 1.0 ± 0.6 mm, and 0.7 ± 0.6 mm, respectively; degrees in rotation for yaw, roll, and pitch were 0.8 ± 0.6, 0.6 ± 0.4, and 1.6 ± 1.1, respectively. The transverse error was smaller than sagittal and vertical errors; error for pitch was larger than roll and yaw (both p < 0.001). Error for sagittal, transverse, and roll positioning was affected by the achieved skeletal movement (roll, p < 0.05; pitch and yaw, p < 0.001). Surgical error of pitch positioning was affected by planned and achieved skeletal movement (both p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Using the novel intermediate splint when performing Le Fort I osteotomy allowed for accurate positioning of the maxilla. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The novel intermediate splint for maxillary positioning can be reliably used in clinical routines.

Piezosurgery versus conventional rotary surgeryfor impacted third molars: A randomised, split-mouth, clinical pilot trial / Piezocirugía versus cirugía rotatoria convencionalpara terceros molares retenidos: un ensayo piloto clínico aleatorizado, de boca dividida

Background: Few studies have compared the effects of piezosurgery and conventional rotary surgery for impacted wisdom teeth on the quality of life. Among these studies, the inclusion parameters and evaluation methods have varied. Material and Methods: This study aimed to compare the effects of piezosurgery and conventional rotary instruments on the quality of life using a standardised method. Patients with bilateral and symmetric mandibularimpacted wisdom teeth were included based on the Winter and Pell-Gregory scale and Yuasa difficulty index criteria. The primary objective was to assess the effects of the methods on the quality of life using the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 questionnaire. Secondary objectives included comparisons of swelling, trismus, pain, and total operative times. The study was conducted between October 2021 and March 2022. The clinical trial protocol was recorded in the United States National Library of Medicine clinical trial registry (NCT05545553). Results: We enrolled 20 patients (40 wisdom teeth) and found that the removal of impacted teeth using the piezosurgery method positively affected the quality of life and considerably improved swelling, trismus, and pain scores. However, piezosurgery may affect postoperative morbidities such as increased total operative times. Conclusions: Piezosurgery appears to have advantages over conventional rotary surgery for impacted wisdom tooth extraction in terms of quality of life and postoperative symptoms. However, further research should investigate potential drawbacks and confirm these findings.(AU)

Accuracy and stability of the condyle position after orthognathic surgery: A retrospective study.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and stability of condylar positioning in patients treated with bimaxillary procedures compared with patients treated with maxillary procedures alone. All patients had undergone treatment at Odense University Hospital and were treated with inferior maxillary procedures. The primary outcome was changes in condyle position and the primary predictor variable was time: pre-operative (T0) measurements to 1-week post-operative (T1) and 1-year post-operative (T2) measurements. Condyle movement was measured using dual voxel-based alignment. Sixteen patients were included. Seven patients underwent solitary maxillary procedure and 9 patients bimaxillary procedure. Bimaxillary procedures overall showed a condyle positional change in pitch from T0 to T1 and T1 to T2 compared to maxillary procedures alone. Condylar translation was stable despite large differences in positioning. Compared to solitary maxillary procedures, bimaxillary procedures showed a statistically significant anterocranial rotation at 1-week follow-up movement (3.95° vs. -0.95°; SD 3,74 vs 1,05; P value = 0.000) and an additional statistically significant anterocranial movement at 1 year after surgery (4.89° vs 0.60°; SD 3,82 vs 0,92; P value = 0.000). In conclusion a need for greater anterocranial stability of the sagittal split osteotomy than that provided by 3 bicortically fixated screws alone might be indicated.

Average Three-Dimensional Skeletofacial Model as a Template for Bone Repositioning during Virtual Orthognathic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Virtual planning has revolutionized orthognathic surgery. This study presents a computer-assisted method for constructing average three-dimensional skeletofacial models that can be applied as templates for surgical planning for maxillomandibular repositioning. METHODS: The authors used the images of 60 individuals (30 women and 30 men) who had never undergone orthognathic surgery to construct an average three-dimensional skeletofacial model for male participants and one for female participants. The authors validated the accuracy of the newly developed skeletofacial models by comparing their images with 30 surgical simulation images (ie, skulls) that had been created using three-dimensional cephalometric normative data. The comparison was conducted by superimposing surgical simulation images created using the authors' models with the previously created images to analyze their differences, particularly differences in the jawbone position. RESULTS: For all participants, the authors compared the jaw position in the surgical simulation images created using the authors' average three-dimensional skeletofacial models with that in the images created using three-dimensional cephalometric normative data. The results revealed that the planned maxillary and mandibular positions were similar in both images and that the differences between all facial landmarks were less than 1 mm, except for one dental position. Most studies have reported less than 2 mm to be the success criterion for the distance difference between planned and outcome images; thus, the authors' data indicate high consistency between the images in terms of jawbone position. CONCLUSION: The authors' average three-dimensional skeletofacial models provide an innovative template-assisted orthognathic surgery planning modality that can enhance the fully digital workflow for virtual orthognathic surgical planning. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, V.

Surgery-First Orthognathic Approach for Correction of Dentofacial Deformity in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.

BACKGROUND: Although several studies have reported the advantages of the surgery-first approach for orthognathic correction of class III deformity, there is no report of the success of this approach for patients with cleft lip and palate. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the stability and outcome of bimaxillary surgery for cleft-related dentofacial deformity using a surgery-first approach. METHODS: Forty-one patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate who consecutively underwent Le Fort I and bilateral sagittal split osteotomies for skeletal class III deformity were included. Cone-beam computed tomographic scans before surgery, 1 week after surgery, and after orthodontic treatment were used to measure the surgical and postsurgical changes in jaw position by landmarks, and outcomes of jaw protrusion and relation, incisor angle and occlusion, and menton deviation after treatment. Self-report questionnaires regarding satisfaction with overall appearance of the face and seven facial regions were administered after treatment. RESULTS: A clinically insignificant relapse was found in the maxilla (<1 mm) and mandible (<2 mm). There was a significant improvement in the jaw protrusion and relation, incisor angle and occlusion, and menton deviation. Responses from the self-report questionnaires completed after treatment indicated that patient satisfaction was high. CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate surgical-orthodontic treatment with a surgery-first approach can successfully improve cleft-related dentofacial deformity in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Soft-Tissue Response following Genioplasty Combined with Anterior Segmental Osteotomy.

BACKGROUND: The authors' main aim was to analyze soft-tissue response of the chin following genioplasty with anterior segmental osteotomy, which enables optimal surgical planning of genioplasty. METHODS: Sixty-two patients who underwent genioplasty with concomitant anterior segmental osteotomy were divided into three groups depending on the direction of pogonion (Pog) movement: G1 (without sagittal change), G2 (advancement genioplasty), and G3 (setback genioplasty). All genioplasties included height reduction. Hard- and soft-tissue measurements with cephalometry were performed at T1 (before surgery), T2 (after surgery), and T3 (after orthodontic treatment) for the analysis of sagittal and vertical changes. Correlation and regression analyses were conducted to analyze soft- to hard -tissue movement and soft-tissue thickness changes. RESULTS: During the T1 to T2 period, the horizontal soft- to hard-tissue ratio at Pog was 0.85 in G2 and 0.80 in G3, and the vertical ratio at menton (Me) was 0.9 for all groups. The correlation coefficients were 0.64 (G2) and 0.83 (G3) at Pog and 0.9 (all), 0.85 (G1), 0.95 (G3) at Me. There was no significant correlation between initial soft-tissue thickness and soft-tissue response ratio. During the T2 to T3 period, no significant relapses were observed, which demonstrates the stability of anterior segmental osteotomy combined genioplasty. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically and statistically significant soft-tissue responses were demonstrated at Pog and Me. The higher values in G3 in particular suggest that setback genioplasty with anterior segmental osteotomy is an effective treatment alternative to conventional two-jaw surgery in some patients with bimaxillary prognathism with macrogenia. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Thematic Analysis of Parental Experiences of Patients' Orthognathic Surgery.

Orthognathic surgery often requires extensive orthodontic preparation and a prolonged postoperative recovery that can be stressful for patients and their families. Parents are a primary source of support for patients; accordingly, a better understanding of the parents' experience of orthognathic surgery can help inform clinical care. Using a prospective cross-sectional qualitative study design, 4 focus groups (2 English and 2 Spanish; mean length 65 min) were held with parents of patients who had completed orthognathic surgery for class II/III malocclusion. Thematic content analysis of the group transcriptions was conducted. Participants were 10 mothers and 3 fathers of 12 children (50% with cleft lip/palate) ages 17 to 23 who completed LeFort I (41.7%), LeFort I with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO; 41.7%), or BSSO (16.7%) within the prior 3 to 16 months. Themes fit within a chronological framework: (1) Preparing for Surgery included their larger health context, anticipating surgery, surgery preparation by team and family, and religious faith; (2) Challenges after Surgery consisted of complications, pain, frustration, nutritional challenges, parental anxiety, activity changes, sleep, breathing issues, swelling, and unanticipated aspects of surgery; and (3) Supports after Surgery were nutritional support, appreciation of medical team, postoperative improvements, appearance changes, communicating, supporting patient, and patient coping. Parents also offered advice for families and medical teams. Surgeons and other providers who are part of orthognathic surgical preparation can implement recommendations based on parental experiences to increase patient and family readiness for surgery by providing early education, assisting with advocacy, focusing on nutrition, and supporting coping.

Objective assessment of visual attention in orthognathic surgery training based on eye tracking.

The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in visual attention between novices and orthognathic experts, as well as to provide evidence for use in developing and optimizing training strategies for orthognathic surgery. Novice and orthognathic experts were recruited, and their distributions of visual attention were monitored via an eye-tracking device while they watched orthognathic surgery videos. The percentages of visual fixation duration devoted to the areas of interest - surgical objects, instruments controlled by the main surgeon, and instruments controlled by the assistants - in each orthognathic surgery section were analyzed and compared between the two groups using repeated-measures factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA). In total, there were 18 participants, comprising both novices (n = 9) and experts (n = 9). For all sections of orthognathic surgery, the percentage of fixation duration on surgical objects was significantly higher for the novices than for the experts (p = 0.031, p = 0.005, p = 0.026, p = 0.047, p = 0.047, p = 0.031, p = 0.027, p = 0.034, p = 0.008, and p = 0.016). During the maxillary segment separation as part of Le Fort I osteotomy and the splitting of the mandible as part of bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, the novices also had a higher percentage of fixation duration on the instruments controlled by the main surgeon, as compared with the experts (p = 0.007 and p = 0.048, respectively). Novices invested great cognitive effort into the surgical objects in each section of orthognathic surgery, including the instruments controlled by the main surgeon in the maxillary segment separation and the splitting of the mandible. Strengthening this aspect of instruction could help novices reduce their cognitive load and achieve mastery more efficiently.

Do Patients Detect Changes in Breathing After Orthognathic Surgery?

BACKGROUND: Orthognathic surgery addresses facial aesthetics and function in patients with dentofacial deformities. It is associated with changes in upper airway volume (UAV). If changes in UAV are perceived by asymptomatic patients is unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose was to measure associations between changes in UAV and patient-reported benefits using patient-reported outcome measures. STUDY DESIGN: A sample presenting dentofacial deformities without reported breathing problems undergoing orthognathic surgery was retrospectively studied. Patients aged 18-30 years with 12-month follow-up were included. Patients with systemic disease, drug abuse, mental health disorder, or temporomandibular joint dysfunction were excluded. PREDICTOR: The predictor variable was changes in UAV measured in 3-dimensional computed tomography. Subjects were grouped into increased or decreased UAV. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE: The primary outcome variable was changes in health-related quality of life measured with Oral Health Impact Profile 49 (OHIP-49). COVARIATES: Weight, height, age, sex, and sub-scaled OHIP-49 were registered. Cephalometric measurements of hard tissue movements were recorded. ANALYSES: Mean, standard deviation, and a level of statistical significance at P < .05 were used. Differences in OHIP-49 were compared using unpaired t-test. The correlation between covariates and outcomes was analyzed using the Spearman's rank test. Analysis of covariance between the predictor and outcome, adjusted for covariates (body mass index), was performed. RESULTS: Fifty-four subjects with a mean age of 20.89 years and 52% males were enrolled. The mean change in UAV was 0.12 cm3 (standard deviation [SD] 9.21, P = .93) with a mean absolute deviation of 7.28 cm3 (SD 5.54). The mean change in OHIP-49 score was 20.93 (SD 28.90). Twenty-seven (50%) subjects had increased UAV (7.4 cm3, SD 6.13) and the other had decreased (-7.17 cm3, SD 5.01) (P = .01). At follow-up, equal levels of mean OHIP-49 score were found, but because of a baseline difference (15.74, P = .048), the subjects with and without increased UAV improved in OHIP-49 score 13.04 (SD 30.53) and 28.81 (SD 25.33), respectively (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Because equal levels of OHIP-49 score at follow-up, changes in UAV could not be associated with patient-reported health-related quality of life. Patient-reported outcome measure evaluations of orthognathic surgical treatment for airway obstruction should be performed in patients with a perceived impairment.

Does Anesthesiologist Experience Influence Early Postoperative Outcomes Following Orthognathic Surgery?

BACKGROUND: Anesthesia provider experience impacts nausea and vomiting in other surgical specialties but its influence within orthognathic surgery remains unclear. PURPOSE: The study purpose was to evaluate whether anesthesiologist experience with orthognathic surgery impacts postoperative outcomes, including nausea, emesis, narcotic use, and perioperative adverse events, for patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: This is a retrospective cohort study of subjects aged 12 to 35 years old who underwent orthognathic surgery, including Le Fort 1 osteotomy ± bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, at Boston Children's Hospital from August 2018 to January 2022. Subjects were excluded if they had incomplete medical records, a syndromic diagnosis, or a hospital stay of greater than 2 days. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: The predictor variable was attending anesthesia provider experience with orthognathic surgery. Providers were classified as experienced or inexperienced, with experienced providers defined as having anesthetized ≥10 orthognathic operations during the study period. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLES: The primary outcome variable was postoperative nausea. Secondary outcome variables were emesis, narcotic use in the hospital, and perioperative adverse events within 30 days of their operation. COVARIATES: Study covariates included age, sex, race, comorbidities (body mass index, history of psychiatric illness, cleft lip and/or palate, chronic pain, postoperative nausea/vomiting, gastrointestinal conditions), enhanced recovery after surgery protocol enrollment, and intraoperative factors (operation performed, anesthesia/procedure times, estimated blood loss, intravenous fluid and narcotic administration, and anesthesiologist's years in practice). ANALYSES: χ2 and unpaired t-tests were used to compare primary predictor and covariates against outcome variables. A P-value <.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: There were 118 subjects included in the study after 4 were excluded (51.7% female, mean age 19.1 ± 3.30 years). There were 71 operations performed by 5 experienced anesthesiologists (mean cases/provider 15.4 ± 5.95) and 47 cases by 22 different inexperienced providers (mean cases/provider 1.91 ± 1.16). The nausea rate was 52.1% for experienced providers and 53.2% for inexperienced providers (P = .909). There were no statistically significant associations between anesthesiologist experience and any outcome variable (P > .341). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Anesthesia providers' experience with orthognathic surgery did not significantly influence postoperative nausea, emesis, narcotic use, or perioperative adverse events.